Never-Before-Seen Epstein Photos Show People ‘Engaged in Sexual Acts’ and Victims in ‘Compromising Positions’: Insider

House Democrats have escalated the political firestorm surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s estate by revealing that some unreleased photographs depict individuals engaged in sexual acts, potentially involving victims and minors.

The disclosures, made during cable news interviews Friday, come as the Democratic minority on the House Oversight Committee continues selectively releasing images from a massive cache of over 95,000 photos, intensifying calls for full transparency while drawing accusations of partisan maneuvering.

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.), a freshman member of the committee, confirmed the explicit nature of some material during an appearance on CNN with Kasie Hunt. When asked directly if the committee possesses images of “people engaged in sexual acts,” Subramanyam replied: “As part of this release, yes, there are pictures of people engaged in sexual acts.”

Pressed on whether men other than Epstein are depicted, the congressman cautioned: “We’re going through that. We’re not really quite sure yet who is who.” He added a sobering note: “Certainly, there are a lot of people involved, though, in some of these acts.”

Subramanyam elaborated on the term “disturbing,” widely used to describe the collection: “I mean, we’re talking about sexual acts involving, potentially, minors and certainly victims, too, in very suggestive, compromising positions. Just to leave it at that.”

Did You Know?:ICE Detains Wife of Staunch MAGA Supporter Who Donated Almost All His Net Income to Trump Campaign

Social Photos First, Explicit Later?

The initial batch of 19 photos, released December 12, featured more than 10 prominent men—including President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Steve Bannon, Bill Gates and Prince Andrew (Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor)—in innocuous social settings spanning years.

None depicted misconduct or apparent minors, according to CNN assessments. That same day, Democrats released an additional 70 images, primarily alternate angles of previously disclosed scenes from Epstein’s private island.

Ranking member Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) echoed the gravity during a separate CNN interview with Kaitlan Collins.

“Some of the images they received from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate are quite disturbing,” Garcia said, noting “many, many photos of women” and specifying that “some are very disturbing of women and their conditions.” He pledged further releases in the “days and weeks” ahead.

Both lawmakers emphasized consultation with victims’ advocates on redactions and timing, with faces of several women blurred for privacy. Garcia stressed: “The only people we’re really consulting with, when it comes to whether or not it’s appropriate to put something out, is victims.”

Trending: Texas teacher who invited ICE to raid his school because of ‘many students who don’t even speak English’ booted from campus

No Shields for Powerful Figures

Subramanyam rejected suggestions of preferential treatment, telling Hunt: “We are not looking to shield anyone, Democrat or Republican. We are finding the evidence, and we’re putting it out.” Asked specifically about advance warning to the Clinton family, he demurred but extended an open invitation: “If the Clintons have information, we want to hear it. We welcome them to come testify before a committee, clear their names.”

The same applied broadly: “We want to hear from them all about what they know when it came to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes,” including Gates, Prince Andrew, and others pictured.

The approach signals Democrats’ intent to use the material for accountability across party lines, though the phased rollout—starting with social photos—has fueled Republican charges of political theater.

White House officials have dismissed the releases as “cherry-picked” attempts to fabricate narratives against Trump, pointing to prior Democratic connections to Epstein. The administration highlights its own transparency efforts: signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, declassifying over 33,000 pages, and ongoing DOJ reviews.

Yet, the explicit content revelations raise the stakes. Victims’ advocacy groups have long demanded unredacted releases, warning that selective drips risk retraumatization without delivering justice.

Legal experts note that graphic images could complicate public disclosure due to privacy laws, child protection statutes, and ongoing civil litigation tied to Epstein’s estate.

TOP STORIES

• New Epstein Photos Capture Trump With Numerous Women — Plus the ‘I’m HUUUUGE’ $4 Condoms
• ‘He’s dangerous’: Epstein grew terrified of Trump, fearing the worst before his death
• Trump’s FBI Spent Nearly $1 Million on Redacting Epstein Files: Report

As the committee pores through the remaining tens of thousands of photos alongside digital files and physical evidence, the process promises more revelations.

Subramanyam and Garcia’s comments preview potentially explosive material ahead—images that could either substantiate long-standing allegations against Epstein’s network or, if handled selectively, deepen public cynicism.

Incase You Missed It: Melania’s Cryptic White House Announcement Throws Trump into Disarray: ‘I Don’t Know What She’s Doing’

For now, the careful calibration—social snapshots first, explicit content teased—keeps Washington and the nation on edge, revisiting a scandal that has implicated elites across politics, business, and royalty for years. Whether full, unfiltered release follows, or partisan filters prevail, remains the defining question as Democrats vow to continue the rollout.