Karoline Leavitt Branded ‘Pathetic’ After Being Caught ‘Lying’ About Trump’s Latest Greenland Slip

Karoline Leavitt faced swift and widespread backlash after she aggressively denied that Trump confused Iceland with Greenland during his address to the World Economic Forum—despite the delivered remarks containing multiple explicit references to Iceland in contexts where Greenland was clearly intended.

The exchange, which unfolded publicly on X, has been widely described as an attempt to gaslight journalists and the public in real time, further eroding trust in the administration’s communications strategy.

The controversy began when NewsNation correspondent Libbey Dean posted on Wednesday: “President Trump appeared to mix up Greenland and Iceland around three times.”

Leavitt responded within minutes: “No he didn’t, Libby. His written remarks referred to Greenland as a ‘piece of ice’ because that’s what it is. You’re the only one mixing anything up here.”

The denial was immediately challenged by the video and transcript of Trump’s speech, which directly contradicted Leavitt’s claim.

During the address, Trump stated: “All the U.S. is asking is for a place called Greenland. And until the last few days, when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. They called me daddy, right, last time? Very smart man said, he’s our daddy. He’s running it. I was like running it.”

He continued: “But the problem with NATO is that we’ll be there for them 100%. They’re not there for us on Iceland. That I can tell you. I mean, our stock market took the first dip yesterday because of Iceland. So Iceland’s already cost us a lot of money.”

On X, commenters quickly highlighted the obvious discrepancies: “I’m not sure how many people watched Trump’s incoherent speech but I’m sure it’s in the 10s of millions. Leavitt just plain lying here as on numerous occasions he referred to Greenland as Iceland. She’s pathetic,”Jon Wiltshire wrote.

“She’s literally trying to gaslight the entire country in real time. The president said ‘Iceland’ three times. We all heard it. The video exists. This is next-level delusion.”

“This is what happens when the boss can’t be wrong—even when he is. Leavitt’s out here rewriting reality on the fly.”

The incident has been seized on as the latest example of the administration’s aggressive media strategy: deny observable reality, attack the credibility of the journalist, and double down regardless of available evidence.

Trending: ‘We’ll Sue Your A– Off’: Leaked Audio Exposes Karoline Leavitt Threatening CBS – and Relaying Trump’s Orders

Trump’s Long-Standing Greenland Obsession

Trump’s fixation on Greenland dates back to his first term, when he publicly floated the idea of purchasing the island from Denmark—a proposal Danish officials dismissed as “absurd.” The notion resurfaced prominently in his second term, with Trump repeatedly framing Greenland as strategically vital to counter Russia and China in the Arctic.

In recent weeks, the rhetoric has escalated dramatically. Trump has refused to rule out extreme measures (including nuclear force) to acquire the island and even posted a doctored Wikipedia image declaring himself “acting president of Venezuela” in a related pattern of territorial grandstanding.

The World Economic Forum speech marked the latest public confusion between Greenland (a vast, sparsely populated Danish territory) and Iceland (a sovereign NATO member nation with a small but strategically located population). The two are geographically and politically distinct, making the repeated mix-up particularly glaring.

Did You Know?: Karoline Leavitt Brought to Tears After Savage Impression Mocks Her Defense of Trump’s Lies

Leavitt’s Pattern of Aggressive Media Defense

Leavitt, 28, has earned a reputation for combative, confrontational, and often personal briefings. She has previously labeled journalists “left-wing hacks,” refused to answer questions from foreign reporters she deemed biased, and engaged in heated exchanges that critics describe as unprofessional.

Her quick and dismissive reply to Dean—“No he didn’t, Libby”—fits this pattern: immediate denial followed by an attack on the journalist’s credibility and a refusal to engage with the evidence.

Critics argue this approach has become a defining feature of the administration’s communications strategy: reject inconvenient facts, insult the messenger, and rely on the base to accept the alternative narrative.

The incident has renewed concerns about the administration’s relationship with truth and media: It reinforces perceptions of a White House that routinely denies observable reality. It highlights the pressure placed on press secretaries to defend even the president’s most obvious verbal missteps. Also, it adds to the growing list of moments where administration officials appear to prioritize loyalty and narrative control over accuracy.

Media watchdogs and First Amendment advocates have pointed to the exchange as part of a broader pattern of hostility toward the press, including: The recent FBI raid on Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson’s home and seizure of her devices. Trump’s history of filing or threatening lawsuits against major outlets (The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, BBC, and CBS). More so, Leavitt’s own combative briefings, including labeling reporters “left-wing activists” who “shouldn’t even be sitting in that seat.”

Social media users mocked Leavitt’s claim relentlessly: “Gaslighting level: expert. We all watched the same speech. He said Iceland. Multiple times.” “She’s not even trying to be credible anymore. Just straight-up denial.” “This is what happens when the boss can’t be wrong—even when he is.”

The exchange has also become political fodder. Democrats have highlighted it as evidence of the administration’s detachment from reality, while some Republicans privately express frustration over the optics.

The White House has not issued further clarification beyond Leavitt’s initial tweet.

---

TOP STORIES

1. Gamblers Accuse Karoline Leavitt of ‘Insider Trading’ After Abrupt Stage Exit
2. Karoline Leavitt Got ‘Cosmetic Fillers While Pregnant?’—Social Media Throws Trump’s Bulldog Under the Bus
3. Jack Smith, Who Claimed He Found Dirt on Trump, Is Now Set to Give Live Testimony in Major Reversal

---

As Trump’s second term continues to generate controversy—from Greenland fixation to immigration enforcement to economic claims—the press secretary’s role has become increasingly defensive.

Whether Leavitt’s aggressive style ultimately helps or hurts the administration’s credibility remains an open question, but incidents like this ensure that every public statement and every attempted correction will face intense, immediate scrutiny.

In the age of instant fact-checking, viral video, and archived transcripts, “No he didn’t, Libby” has proven far harder to sell than the president’s original slip itself.

The moment has become emblematic of a broader struggle: the battle between observable reality and the administration’s preferred narrative. And in this case, the evidence is clear, public, and impossible to unsee.